Trends
Pam Golding Lodges and Guesthouses expanding into Gauteng
   
Finance
Acquiring a distressed business may be a bargain but beware pitfalls
   
Immigration
Home Affairs and its promises
   
Legal
The Consumer Protection Act as applicable to Prepaid Vouchers
   
Risk
The current economic climate is affecting the way you insure a Tourism Business
 
 
Subscribe to our bi-monthly
HPASA newsletter.
Back to Main
August 2011
FICA INCREASES RISK ON ESTATE AGENTS
 

AJ Beukes
Exceed Tax & Management Services
The three month compulsory registration period for Estate Agents to register with FICA has recently ended on 28 February 2011. Since that date the requirements of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001 is applicable to all estate agents.

In short The Act prescribes certain duties to all accountable institutions (including estate agents).

The areas that will mainly affect the operations of estate agents are the following:
1. Duty to identify clients.
2. Duty to keep records.
3. Period for which records must be kept.
4. Duty to report suspicious and unusual transactions.
5. Duty to report cash transactions above the prescribed limit (Currently R25,000).
6. Duty to report transfers of money to and from the Republic.
7. Formulation and implementation of internal rules.
Non-Compliance
An accountable institution that fails to comply with the provisions of the act is guilty of an offence. A person convicted of an offence is liable to imprisonment not exceeding 15 years or to a fine not exceeding R10,000,000.

Sourced From: Exceed


August 2011
NEW FRINGE BENEFIT FOR EMPLOYEES
 

Jonathan Coetzee
Tenk Loubser & Associates
A number of Employers have, for several years, been contributing towards either an employee death or an employee disability policy on behalf of their employees (long-term insurance policies). The aforementioned policies were provided either by means of ‘approved’ plans or ‘unapproved’ plans, as defined by the South African Revenue Service (SARS).

These policies can be structured in the following ways:
1. The proceeds can be paid directly to the employees
2. The proceeds can be paid directly to the employer, with a side arrangement existing between
2. the employer and employee whereby the employer will pay proceeds over to the employee

For many years, these contributions to policies on behalf of employees were allowed as a deduction for the employer, with no matching accounting for a fringe benefit in the hands of the employee.

With effect 1 JANUARY 2011, these rules have however changed.
If an employer enters into a group life or group disability plan for the direct or indirect benefit of the employees or their beneficiaries (the employees are the beneficiaries of the policies), the employer will only be allowed a deduction of said contributions if these premiums give rise to a simultaneous fringe benefit inclusion for the employees.
If the employer is the beneficiary of the said policy and there is a side arrangement to repay the proceeds to the employee, the tax treatment will be similar to the aforementioned paragraph. The value of the said fringe benefit in both options will be equal to the premiums paid by the employer.

Sourced From: Exceed
---------------------------------------------------------------------- | Back to Top | -----------------------------------------------------------------------  
 

Hospitality Partners Association, Monterey, 12-14 Klaassens Road, Bishopscourt, Cape Town, 7708, South Africa
© Copyright on all information 2012 - Hospitality Partners Association